Charging Ahead
by Steve Guay, Lydall Affinity
January 1, 2010
|
|
| All chillers manufactured in the United States must be
HCFC-free. New chillers will use alternatives such as R134a refrigerant
|
|
The phaseout of R22 refrigerant has begun. Is your plant ready?
Like most characters of notoriety, R22 has many aliases,
including chlorodifluoromethane (CHClF2), hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22 (HCFC-22)
and difluoromonochloromethane. Call it what you like — our dependence on this
and other HCFCs is coming to an end.
Although R22 has long been recognized as an effective way to move waste heat in
chillers, the scientific community has identified this refrigerant as an
ozone-depleting compound. As a result, effective January 1, 2010, no new
equipment charged with R22 can be manufactured in the United States, and the
production of this refrigerant will be phased out over the next decade.
The Timeline
|
|
| Table 1. Alternative refrigerants such as R407c often are
less efficient than R22.
|
|
Despite R22’s sinister reputation, it is actually far less
harmful to the environment than its predecessors. The environmental impact of a
gas is measured by its ozone-depletion potential (ODP), which is the relative
amount the element contributes to ozone layer degradation, and global warming
potential (GWP), which is the relative amount the element contributes to global
warming compared to the same mass of carbon dioxide, which has a GWP of 1.
Trichlorofluoromethane (R11) and dichlorodifluoromethane (R12), which were
common refrigerants until they were banned under the Montreal Protocol in 1994,
have a 100-year GWP of 4,600 (4,600 times the carbon dioxide standard) and
8,100, respectively, and an ODP of 1.0. R22 has a much lower 100-year GWP of
1,700 and an ODP of 0.5.
But these figures aren’t low enough. Under a 1992 amendment to the Montreal
Protocol, which is implemented in the United States by the Environmental
Protection Agency through Title VI of the Clean Air Act, HCFCs, including R22,
must be phased out in favor of ozone-friendly refrigerants.
What does this mean for your plant? If your chiller uses R22 — and most of the
chillers in operation right now do — you can legally continue this use until
January 1, 2030. However, as restrictions on producing and selling this
refrigerant increase over time, R22 will become more expensive and more
difficult to obtain. By January 1, 2020, the production and import of R22 will
be banned in the United States, and only recycled quantities of the refrigerant
will be available. It is wise to begin planning now.
The Alternatives
Chillers that rely on environmentally acceptable
hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants such as R407c or R134a are readily
available. Additionally, most chiller manufacturers have developed retrofit
solutions for existing R22 chillers, so you do not necessarily have to replace
all of your chillers with new models.
Unfortunately, making the switch is not as simple as it sounds. In the short
term, there may be some localized shortages of alternative refrigerants. What
is more, HCFCs such as R22 are good at moving heat, and CFCs were even better.
Modern ozone-friendly replacements can actually be as much as 40 percent less
efficient in comparison. For example, a chiller used to cool a 10-kW laser
using R22 might only be capable of cooling a 6-kW laser using an HFC. Good for
the planet, yes, but not great for your process. Table 1 compares the
performance of a chiller using R22 and R407c.
Additionally, while some conversions will involve simple refrigerant swaps,
others will require different compressors, control valves or other components.
And, when considering the purchase of a replacement chiller, it will be
critical to understand your heat load.
If you are still using R22, you should contact your equipment supplier to begin
developing a phase-out plan. Many variables must be considered when making the
change. Partnering with a knowledgeable chiller manufacturer can go a long way
toward facilitating the transition.
|