This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Process Cooling logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Process Cooling logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Editions
    • Archives
    • News
    • Products
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Web Exclusives
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • eNewsletter
    • PC Mobile App
    • Photo Galleries
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • Technology
    • Air Cooling
    • Ammonia Refrigeration
    • Cryogenic Systems
    • Equipment Cooling
    • Flow Control/Monitoring
    • Heat Transfer
    • Industrial Gases
    • Leak Detection
    • Temperature Control/Sensing
    • Water Cooling
    • Water Treatment
  • Equipment
    • Chillers
    • Compressors/Condensers
    • Cooling Towers
    • Enclosure Cooling
    • Fans & Blowers
    • Filtration
    • Heat Exchangers/Coils
    • Pumping
    • Refrigeration Systems
    • Valves & Piping
  • Design/Build
  • Industry Focus
    • All Process Industries
    • Beverages & Breweries
    • Chemicals/Petrochemicals
    • Cosmetics & Fragrances
    • Dairy Foods
    • Electronics
    • Food Processing
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Power Plants
    • Plastics
    • Soaps/Cleaners
  • Resources
    • Events
    • Classifieds
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Store
    • White Papers
  • Directories
    • Buyers Guide
    • Cooling Capabilities
    • Take a Tour
    • Heat Transfer Fluids
  • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
    • Print Edition Subscription
    • Digital Edition Subscription
    • eNewsletters
    • Online Registration
    • Customer Service
Home » An Icy Situation
All Process IndustriesWater Cooling

An Icy Situation

Process Cooling Cooling and Towers Topic
September 1, 2011
KEYWORDS evaporative cooling / ice control
Reprints
No Comments

Cooling towers are especially susceptible to ice formation. Understanding temperature gradients is the first line of defense. A properly designed cooling tower promotes the maximum possible contact between air and water - and does so for the maximum possible time period. This effort on the part of the designer results in an efficiency that, although greatly appreciated in the summertime, has the capability to produce performance-degrading ice formations during winter operation. Therefore, means by which the cooling tower's efficiency either can be controlled or can be made to work toward the management of ice formations must be incorporated into its design, and they must be properly utilized by the operator.

While there are several methods of ice control, this article will closely examine temperature gradients and how they impact ice formation.

As on any outside structure, ice can form on a cooling tower in the wintertime purely by natural effect. In addition, being a device that moves air through water - cooling mainly by evaporation - a cooling tower can promote the formation of ice by its very operation.

Whether caused by nature or by the tower itself, the owner’s concern for an ice formation on a cooling tower should be a reflection of both its location and extent of icing. Ice on exposed working platforms can be a personnel hazard and should be corrected manually. Light random ice on the louvers, structure and the leading edges of fill is usually of minor concern. Ice allowed to form on fans and other mechanical equipment - not to mention the shrouds and control devices associated with that mechanical equipment - can lead to catastrophe.

Generally speaking, an acceptable level of ice formation is characterized by ice with a relatively thin cross-section and that forms on the louvers or air-intake structure of an induced draft tower. Figure 1 shows what might be considered an acceptable amount of ice formed inside the air-intake structure of a counterflow cooling tower, and it also shows a relatively light curtain of ice on the louvers of a crossflow tower. Because this amount of ice normally would be anticipated in a cooling tower’s design loading, it is customarily of little structural concern and. In some cases, its retardation of airflow through the tower achieves a result similar to the airside control procedures. (For more on airside control procedures, see the web exclusive “Airside Control,” posted on www.process-cooling.com.) However, although this ice may still be considered acceptable, it has proceeded to a point where measures that limit or remove it should be undertaken.

If allowed to grow unchecked, ice can achieve massive cross-section, encroaching upon the fill or totally blocking airflow (figure 2). Its weight alone can overload affected members and, when ice of such mass dislodges, it is obviously capable of doing significant damage.

Temperature Gradients

Understanding how to anticipate and control ice requires some knowledge of the water temperature gradients that occur in an operating cooling tower. Without such knowledge, operators often assume that controls that will automatically cycle fans to maintain a leaving cold water temperature well above freezing are sufficient insurance against the formation of ice. Occasionally, they are bewildered to find ice beginning to form even before the cold water basin temperature has depressed to that presumably “safe” level.

The reason, of course, is the temperature gradients that occur transversely in all towers and longitudinally in multi-cell towers where fans are cycled progressively. Figure 3 indicates the typical transverse temperature gradients in a bank of crossflow fill. In this particular case, water is entering the tower at 64.5°F (18°C) and leaving at 44.5°F (7°C) - temperatures that would seem to indicate to an operator that a 12.5°F (7°C) “safe” zone exists between the operating point and freezing.

Obviously, such is not the case. As can be seen, the net outlet temperature of 44.5°F (7°C) results from a mixture of water temperatures varying from about 53°F (12°C) at the inboard edge of the fill to about 33°F (0.5°C) at the outboard edge. Consequently, the real margin of safety is only about 1°F (0.5°C) in this case.

It must not be assumed from this that 44.5°F (7°C) cold water temperature is the “magic” point of control for all operating situations. Water temperatures at the coldest point of the fill are very sensitive to the range (the difference between entering hot and leaving cold water temperatures through which the tower is cooling). At a given cold water temperature control point, reduced ranges (i.e., reductions in heat load at a constant water flow rate) will cause the water temperature at the coldest point of the fill to rise. Conversely, increased ranges (i.e., reductions in water flow at a fixed heat load) will cause lower water temperature at the coldest point of the fill.

To return to the example using the tower and fill shown in figure 3, if the tower was operating at a 10°F (5.5°C) range (cooling the water from 54.5 to 44.5°F, or 12.5 to 7°C), the entering wet-bulb temperature would be 29°F (-1°C), and the water temperature at the coldest point of the fill would be about 38.5°F (3.6°C). As wet-bulb temperature further reduces, measures would need to be taken to diminish airflow through the fill (by fan manipulation), and the coldest water in the fill would reduce only negligibly below that level.

There is also a longitudinal temperature gradient - actually, steps, rather than a gradient, as individual fans are manipulated - in a multi-cell tower. This is because cells with fans operating at full speed contribute much more to the tower’s overall cooling effect than do cells with fans operating at a reduced speed or off. For example, if water were entering the tower in figure 4 at 80°F (26°C) and leaving at a net 60°F (16°C) - achieved by having one fan running and one off - the actual water temperature produced by Cell #1 would be 50°F (10°C), and water at the coldest point of its fill would be at or near freezing.

Figure 5 indicates net performance - and thermal gradients - of a two-cell tower cooling through a 20°F (11°C) range, equipped with single-speed (top) and two-speed (bottom) fans. These curves are drawn on the premise that the operator will manipulate fans to prevent the net cold water temperature from going below 60°F (15°C), and the winter wet bulb temperature can routinely depress to 0°F (-17°C). The solid line indicates the net water temperature sensed by the operator’s thermometers or control devices; the dashed line indicates the net water temperature from the cell operating at the greatest fan speed; and the dotted line indicates the coldest water temperature in the fill.

  • SPX Cooling Technologies

  • Web-Exclusive Sidebar: Potential for Ice

  • Web Exclusive Sidebar: Airside Control

Subscribe to Process Cooling

Related Articles

An Optimized Solution for Closed-Loop Cooling

Top 5 Considerations When Sizing an Industrial Chiller

Recirculating Liquid-to-Liquid Heat Exchangers Offer an Alternative to Chillers

The Need for an Optimized Cooling Setpoint

Related Products

Cryogenic Engineering, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded

Handbook of Manufacturing Processes: How Products, Components...

Statistical Process Control in Manufacturing Practice

Designing Plastic Parts for Assembly, 8E

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print Edition Subscriptions
  • Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

hybrid cooler

Hybrid Cooling Saves Water, Reduces Energy Use

field-erected cooling tower

An Alternative to Field-Erected Cooling Towers

descaling cooling towers

Cleaning Scale from Cooling Tower Systems

News_900

Partnership Focused on Industrial Refrigeration

111319-HRS

Turnkey Cooling System Increases Marinade Production

CoolingCapabilities_360


Events

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

What Do You Look For in a Process Cooling Equipment Supplier?

Let’s talk purchasing: When specifying and purchasing industrial process cooling equipment, what about an equipment supplier is the most important to you?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Refrigeration Systems and Applications, 3rd Edition

Refrigeration Systems and Applications, 3rd Edition

See More Products

events_360

Process Cooling Magazine

Process Cooling November/December 2019

2019 November/December

Check out the November/December 2019 edition of Process Cooling: Tackling tower scale, hybrid cooling, energy conservation, paper mills and plastic towers and much more!
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • Manufacturing Group
    • List Rental
    • Contributor Guidelines
    • Web Exclusives
    • Product of the Month
    • Partners
    • Manufacturers Photo Gallery
    • Polls
    • Survey and Sample
  • Want More
    • Connect
    • Privacy Policy

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing