Dirty and fouled cooling tower water often plagues maintenance teams that manage industrial cooling towers. A dirty cooling tower can have a detrimental effect on the overall health of the plant’s water infrastructure, leading to lower efficiencies and increased costs. Cooling water full of fine sand, grit and biological matter can contribute to damage to analytical instrumentation, creating inaccuracies and premature failure. High solids can give rise to increased deposition of debris within a cooling tower basin, which can provide a home for corrosive anaerobic bacteria.
With increased debris and organic matter, manually cleaning a cooling tower can take days to accomplish. All of these factors contribute to unnecessary downtime, failure of instrumentation, decreased efficiencies, and increased water and chemical usage.
Bag or Cartridge Filtration Technologies
As some of the lowest-cost offerings in cooling tower filtration, bag or cartridge filters are readily available. Typically, pending the design requirement, they cost less than alternative solutions. Many options exist for the types of filter media and materials of construction.
For a bag or cartridge housing to be effective, a few factors should be taken into account. First, the housing needs to be sized based on system flow rate and the desired level of filtration. Second, to utilize the full dirt-loading capabilities of the filtration technology selected, the preferred installation location typically is a place where a high differential pressure is available. This can be accomplished by installing the filter near the main system’s recirculation pumps and sending the filtered water to the tower basin or sump. If decreased cooling water capacity is a concern, another option is installing a pump to provide the necessary flow and pressure.
One benefit of selecting a bag or cartridge filter is the ability to change the retention rating on the filter whenever desired. Bag filters typically are used in higher flow applications or where larger particulate is prevalent within the system. Cartridge filtration is desired in situations where lower flows may exist. Typical uses include applications where lower micron ratings are desired for particulate removal, or where the ability to extend the filter life between change-outs is important. Bag and cartridge filters are offered in several materials of construction and sizes.
The notable costs associated with bag and cartridge filtration are the initial costs of the housing and the recurring cost of replacing the filters.
This article offers a brief overview of several common solutions that exist for tower water filtration. The highlighted benefits may be helpful in deciding which type of filtration to choose for your cooling tower.
The second common offering that can be used for side-stream filtration on a cooling tower is a sand filter.
Typically, a sand filter is constructed of a large fiberglass or stainless vessel that filters out particulate. Within the filter, the water passes through a layered sand-and-gravel mixture. The flow of water through the sand filter typically is top-down. As the particulate begins to collect on the top layers of sand, the differential pressure rises. Once the differential pressure reaches the designed amount, a backwash process is started. The backwash process utilizes either system water or an external source (like city water) to rinse and remove the collected particulate from the sand filter, and then that water is sent to waste.
Sand filters are sized based on flow rate. Most sand filters are able to remove down to 5 microns on average, though 20 to 30 microns is more typical. High efficiency sand filters on the market can remove even smaller particulate if necessary.
The initial capital cost on this type of filtration equipment is higher than bag or cartridge filters. Operational costs with sand filters are low, however. They include media replacement and the cost of water needed to backwash. Further treatment of the backwash wastewater is uncommon, but it must be evaluated. Sand filters can be extremely beneficial for an application where there may be high solids loading, and at plants with limited maintenance personnel.
A third offering, centrifugal separators, can really put particulate into a swirl.
A centrifugal separator is unique compared to the previous two examples in the way that filtration occurs. A centrifugal separator is sized based on flow rate and particle size. The fluid enter the inlet of the separator and, based on the design, begins to swirl, creating a vortex within the housing. As the water spins, the particulate and debris are forced out radially against the housing wall, and the clean fluid travels through the inner vortex of the separator and out the discharge. The collected particulate eventually accumulates in the bottom of the housing and is removed via a solids purge process. Water usage during a purge is minimal.
Centrifugal separators usually are not sized for very fine, low density particle removal due to the time required for the particles to be removed. The simplistic nature of this type of side-stream filtration with minimal waste is often attractive. However, drawbacks and capital costs should be considered.
Another common offering is self-cleaning strainers. Strainers can be highly effective at removing large particulate from cooling water.
A strainer consists of a housing and controls that regulate flow across a metal basket or screen that can trap particulate. After a timed delay or a differential pressure is reached, flow through the strainer is reversed and sent to the drain to flush the collected solids.
A self-cleaning strainer can assist in catching particulate and treat higher flow rates at a reduced cost compared to other options discussed. There is no replacement media with self-cleaning strainers, but they carry a higher capital cost than comparable offerings. The operational costs are limited to only water usage and electricity.
Accessories to Augment Filtration Technologies
With any of the filtration solutions, there are always lists of best practices. No matter the efficiencies or design of each system, proper techniques are necessary to maximize a filter’s ability to stay clean.
When thinking about filtration, it is important to remember that the filter is only capable of removing particulate suspended within the water column. Optimally, an ample amount of agitation should occur inside the cooling tower basin to prevent debris and particulate from settling and accumulating on the basin floor. In many installations, it is recommended to consider a sweeper package system to agitate the basin.
Typically, a sweeper basin package is operated using a high pressure pump that can propel water through the filtration system and then through a series of nozzles within the tower basin to keep the particulate agitated and suspended. A properly designed sweeper basin package or plan to agitate the water can have strong positive effects on the life of the cooling tower.
In conclusion, with the internal and external pressures higher than ever to reduce operating costs, companies and maintenance teams need to start seriously considering investing in cooling tower filtration. The benefits of operating a clean cooling tower are immense. PC
Andrew Horner is an equipment application engineer with Kurita America Inc. The Minneapolis-based company can be reached at 866-663-7633 or visit kuritaamerica.com.